Recognizing Phishing Scams: An Essential Guide for Modern Internet Users
Recognizing Phishing Scams: An Essential Guide for Modern Internet Users Sandbox Security October 14,...
The Paris AI Action Summit, held on February 10–11, 2025, emphasized the need to respond to Cyber Security challenges in artificial intelligence (AI). Among the major developments of the summit was the release of the joint report, “Building Trust in AI Through a Cyber Risk-Based Approach,” describing AI-specified cyber risks and actionable measures to evaluate and reduce risks.
Written by France’s National Cybersecurity Authority (ANSSI) and endorsed by over 15 nations’ agencies, including Canada, Germany, South Korea, and Singapore, the paper advocates a risk-based approach to defend AI development, deployment, and governance. This follows global best practices such as the EU AI Act and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
Prioritizing AI-associated Cyber Risk Reduction is essential to secure and reliable AI deployment.
The report highlights the integration of security in AI systems and value chains via active vulnerability detection and remediation.
While AI systems also have shared software threats, their reliance on data poses unique threats such as data poisoning (tampering with data for training purposes), model extraction (stealing sensitive data or parameters), and evasion attacks (input manipulation to mislead outputs).
Upon established Cyber Security best practices—e.g., secure coding and supply chain security—is important, but these must be rephrased in terms of solutions to the particular challenges posed by AI, e.g., Explainability and Data Integrity.
Three pillars of AI supply chains—Computational Capacity, AI models/software libraries, and Data—are identified by the report as each having different levels of safeguards necessary to meet their respective vulnerabilities.
Prioritized threats include Infrastructure Compromise, Supply Chain Compromisation (i.e., open-source hostile libraries), lateral attack via connected systems (i.e., prompt injection in LLMs), human errors (e.g., automation over-reliance), and System Failure.
Operational direction includes self-assessment checklists (e.g., regulatory compliance, access controls), hardening infrastructure (e.g., multi-factor authentication), and organizational approaches (e.g., personnel training, incident response planning).
Governments are urged to support adversarial AI research, Develop Certification Standards, Promote Cyber Security best practices, facilitate Cross-sector Collaboration, and increase International Partnerships to neutralize new threats.
By the determination of these priorities, the outcome of the summit aims to balance AI innovation with robust safeguards, giving global assurance in AI technologies.
Tags :
Recognizing Phishing Scams: An Essential Guide for Modern Internet Users Sandbox Security October 14,...
EDPS Orientations for Trustworthy & Responsible AI Sandbox Security October 14, 2024 Blog In...
Benefits Of AI-Powered Cybersecurity Automation Sandbox Security September 5, 2024 Blog The benefits of...